https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dign%C4%81ga
The ancient and medieval Indian schools of philosophy call epistemology as Pramanas. Different schools consider different number of epistemic means to correct knowledge, between one of Charvaka school to six of Advaita Vedanta: Pratyakṣa (perception), Anumāṇa (inference), Upamāṇa (comparison and analogy), Arthāpatti (postulation, derivation from circumstances), Anupalabdi (non-perception, negative/cognitive proof) and Śabda (word, testimony of past or present reliable experts). To verify the interconnection and maps above: [1] Jeaneane Fowler (2002), Perspectives of Reality: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Hinduism, Sussex Academic Press, ISBN 978-1898723943, page 134-146; [2] Karl Potter (2004), The Encyclopedia of Indian Philosophies: Indian metaphysics and epistemology, Volume 2, Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN 978-8120803091, pages 222-238; [3] John A Grimes (2006), A Concise Dictionary of Indian Philosophy, State University of New York Press, ISBN 978-0791430675, pages 237-240; [4] Lati Rinbochay and Elizabeth Napper (1981), Mind in Tibetan Buddhism, ISBN 978-0937938027, pages 115-119
法友飛鴻 534:黃運喜老師〈論文寫作經驗分享:談轉引資料〉
-
黃運喜老師:〈論文寫作經驗分享:談轉引資料〉(2024/12/15)
今年審查了數篇學報論文,發現至今還有許多學者的引文是採用轉引方式,而這些轉引文獻都是常見的。其實現在透過網路,要找到一般論著並不困難,學者寫作論文並投稿學報,最基本的工作是文獻回顧,站在前人的基礎上再進一步研究,應該引用原始資料,避免轉引。...
3 days ago
No comments:
Post a Comment