Theis a figure that features prominently in the classical logic of the Greeks. It states that with reference to any a logical proposition X, there are four possibilities:
X (affirmation)
\neg X (negation)
X \land \neg X (both) equiv.
\neg (X \lor \neg X) (neither)
[edit] Catuskoti: a cross-cultural correlate
A similar tradition of fourfold negation, the Catuskoti (Sanskrit), is evident in the logico-epistemological tradition of India, given the categorical nomenclature 'Indian logic' in Western discourse. Subsumed within the auspice of Indian logic, 'Buddhist logic' has been particularly focused in its employment of the fourfold negation, as evidenced by the traditions of Nagarjuna and the Madhyamaka, particularly the school of Madhyamaka given the retroactive nomenclature of Prasangika by the Tibetan Buddhist logico-epistemological tradition.
再談「世尊答僧耆多童女所問偈」,《雜阿含549經》
-
上星期六(2025/2/15),在「《學思》編輯委員會」的聚會裡,閒聊到「CBETA
的標點仍然有錯,一般而言,以『僻典』教易出錯,而日用經典如《心經》、《金剛經》、《藥師經》、《阿彌陀經》則相當準確」;以長行經文較為正確,而偈頌的斷句常會出錯。
這幾天閱讀《雜阿含549經》又發現一例,《雜阿含經》應該算是...
3 days ago
No comments:
Post a Comment