Blogs

Wednesday, 31 July 2013

Neuroscientists and the Dalai Lama Swap Insights on Meditation


An encounter with His Holiness the Dalai Lama and the scientific study of meditation

Knowledge can be communicated, but not wisdom. One can find it, live it, do wonders through it, but one cannot communicate and teach it.
This line from Herman Hesse's 1922 novelSiddhartha came unbidden to me during a recent weeklong visit to Drepung Monastery in southern India. His Holiness the Dalai Lama had invited the U.S.-based Mind and Life Institute to familiarize the Tibetan Buddhist monastic community living in exile in India with modern science. About a dozen of us—physicists, psychologists, brain scientists and clinicians, leavened by a French philosopher—introduced quantum mechanics, neuroscience, consciousness and various clinical aspects of meditative practices to a few thousand Buddhist monks and nuns. As we lectured, we were quizzed, probed and gently made fun of by His Holiness, who sat beside us [see photograph above]. We learned as much from him and his inner circle—such as from his translator, Tibetan Jinpa Thupten, who has a doctorate in philosophy from the University of Cambridge, and from the French monk Matthieu Ricard, who holds a Ph.D. inmolecular biology from the Pasteur Institute in Paris—as they and their brethren from us.
What passed between these representatives of two distinct intellectual modes of thinking about the world were facts, data—knowledge. That is, knowledge about the more than two-millennia-old Eastern tradition of investigating the mind from the inside, from an interior, subjective point of view, and the much more recent insights provided by empirical Western ways to probe the brain and its behavior using a third-person, reductionist framework. What the former brings to the table are scores of meditation techniques to develop mindfulness, concentration, insight, serenity, wisdom and, it is hoped, in the end, enlightenment. These revolve around a daily practice of quiet yet alert sitting and letting the mind settle before embarking on a specific program, such as “focused attention” or the objectless practice of generating a state of “unconditional loving-kindness and compassion.” After years of daily contemplative exercise—nothing comes easily in meditation—practitioners can achieve considerable control over their mind.
Twelve years of schooling, four years of college and an even longer time spent in advanced graduate training fail to familiarize our future doctors, soldiers, engineers, scientists, accountants and politicians with such techniques. Western universities do not teach methods to enable the developing or the mature mind to become quiet and to focus its considerable powers on a single object, event or train of thought. There is no introductory class on “Focusing the Mind.” And this is to our loss!
From introspection, we are all familiar with the mental clutter, the chatter that makes up our daily life. It is a rapid fire of free associations, of jumping from one image, speech fragment or memory to the next. Late-night lucubrations are particularly prone to such erratic zigzagging. Focusing on a single line of argument or thought requires deliberate, laborious and conscious effort from which we flee. We prefer to be distracted by external stimuli, conversations, radio, television or newspapers. Desperate not to be left alone within our mind, to avoid having to think, we turn to our constant electronic companions to check for incoming messages.
Yet here we had His Holiness, a 77-year-old man, who sat during six days, ramrod straight for hours on end, his legs tucked under his body, attentively following our arcane scholarly arguments. I have never experienced a single man, and an entire community, who appeared so open, so content, so happy, constantly smiling, yet so humble, as these monks who, by First World standards, live a life of poverty, deprived of most of the things we believe are necessary to live a fully realized life. Their secret appears to be mind control.
Among the more extreme cases of mind control is the self-immolation of the Vietnamese Buddhist monk Thich Quang Duc in 1963 to protest the repressive regime in South Vietnam. What was so singular about this event, captured in haunting photographs that are among the most readily recognized images of the 20th century, was the calm and deliberate nature of his heroic act. While burning to death, Duc remained throughout in the meditative lotus position. He never moved a muscle or uttered a sound, as the flames consumed him and his corpse finally toppled over.
I am filled with utter bewilderment in the face of this singular event and would have found it difficult to accept as real, were it not captured in the testimony of hundreds of onlookers, including jaundiced journalists with their cameras.
Brain Basis of Mind Control
A step toward a brain-based explanation of this extraordinary phenomenon comes from a recent scanning experiment by Fadel Zeidan, Robert C. Coghill and their colleagues at the Wake Forest School of Medicine. Fifteen volunteers were recruited to lie in a scanner while a small metal plate was attached to their right calf. As its temperature varied from pleasant (near body temperature) to painful (49 degrees Celsius), subjects had to rate both pain intensity and pain unpleasantness of the noxious stimulus. Predictably, the hot probe triggered increased hemodynamic activity in structures that are known to be involved in pain processing, such as the primary and secondary somatosensory cortices that represent the leg, as well as more frontal structures, the anterior cingulate cortex and the insula. Subsequently, the volunteers underwent four days of 20 minutes' daily practice of mindfulness meditation involving focused attention or the Buddhist mind-calming practice calledshamatha. In the latter, the practitioner focuses attention on the changing sensations of her breath, noting thoughts, pictures and memories as they arise from their inner source, but without any emotional engagement. This exercise frees her to quickly disengage from them to return attention to monitoring her breathing.
Practicing mindfulness during the noxious stimulation reduced the unpleasantness of the pain by a whopping 57 percent and its intensity by 40 percent. And this after only minimal training (four times the 20 minutes). Of course, it is a far cry from attenuating the unthinkable agony of burning to death, but still. Mindfulness exerts its effect by promoting a sense of detachment and by reducing the subjectively experienced saliency of the heated metal plate. Yet how does it work in the brain?
Pain-related activity in the primary and secondary somatosensory cortices was reduced by the meditation. Those subjects who experienced the greatest reduction in the intensity of their pain had the largest increase of activity in their right insula and both sides of their anterior cingulate cortices. Subjects with the greatest reduction of the unpleasantness of the pain—which is what most people care about—exhibited the greatest activation of regions in the orbitofrontal cortex and the largest reduction in the thalamus (gating the incoming sensory information).
Think of mindfulness, think of all meditations, as mental skills to control emotions and to shape the impact that external events, such as sight, sound or heat, have on the sensory brain. Select prefrontal regions in the practitioner's brain reach all the way down to the thalamus to reduce the flood of incoming information from the periphery, leading to a lessening of the pain. These skills to steer the mind are not magical, otherworldly or transcendental. They can be learned by sufficiently intensive practice. The only question is whether our instruments are always sufficiently sensitive to pick up their footprints in the brain.
In 2008 Richard J. Davidson and his group at the University of Wisconsin–Madison published a classic study with the active participation of Ricard and other Buddhist monks. The cognitive scientists fitted skullcaps with 128 electroencephalographic (EEG) electrodes to the heads of eight long-term Buddhist practitioners and 10 student volunteers. The former were asked to attain a state of “unconditional loving-kindness and compassion” (a form of meditation that does not focus on a single object and is sometimes referred to as “pure compassion”), whereas the volunteers thought about somebody he or she deeply cared about and then tried to generalize these feelings to all sentient beings.
The onset of meditation in the monks coincided with an increase in high-frequency EEG electrical activity in the so-called gamma band (spanning 25 to 42 oscillations a second), which was synchronized across the frontal and parietal cortices. Such activity is thought to be the hallmark of highly active and spatially dispersed groups of neurons, typically associated with focusing attention. Indeed, gamma activity in these monks is the largest seen in nonpathological conditions and 30 times greater than in the novices. The more years the monks had been practicing meditation, the stronger the (normalized) power in the gamma band.
More important, even when the monks were not meditating, but simply quietly resting, their baseline brain activity was distinct from that of the students. That is, these techniques, practiced by Buddhists for millennia to quiet, focus and expand the mind—the interior aspect of the brain—had changed the brain that is the exterior aspect of the mind. And the more training they had, the bigger the effect.
Yet knowing about meditation and its effect on the brain is not the same as benefiting from it and not the same as achieving wisdom. So just like the young Siddhartha in Hesse's novel, I left the monastic community richer in knowledge about a different way to look at the world but continuing to strive.

This article was originally published with the title The Brain of Buddha.


Buy This Issue
If your institution has site license access, enter here.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR(S)

CHRISTOF KOCH is chief scientific officer at the Allen Institute for Brain Science in Seattle. He serves on Scientific American Mind's board of advisers.

(Further Reading)
Long-Term Meditators Self-Induce High-Amplitude Gamma Synchrony during Mental Practice. A. Lutz, L. L. Greischar, N. B. Rawlings, M. Ricard and R. J. Davidson inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, Vol. 101, No. 46, pages 16,369–16,373; November 16, 2004.
Buddha's Brain: Neuroplasticity and Meditation. R. J. Davidson and A. Lutz in IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, Vol. 25, No. 1, pages 174–176; January 1, 2008.
Brain Mechanisms Supporting the Modulation of Pain by Mindfulness Meditation. F. Zeidan, K. T. Martucci, R. A. Kraft, N. S. Gordon, J. G. McHaffie and R. C. Coghill in Journal of Neuroscience, Vol. 31, No. 14, pages 5540–5548; April 6, 2011.

Tuesday, 9 July 2013

非常人間:不嫁不拍拖 畫唐卡的女兒






張櫻琴(Kim)畫的東西十分小眾,叫唐卡。這個英國藝術名校畢業生,十年前一次西藏之行,看到一幅唐卡,大為觸動,接着遠赴尼泊爾習唐卡六年,矢志獻身這門冷門藝術。
記者:周燕 
攝影:林栢鈞 部份相片由受訪者提供

警世圖案嚇倒常人

唐卡是一種卷軸畫,最早出現於公元七至九世紀,畫中主角通常是諸佛、菩薩、護法神等等,宗教意識濃厚。祂們透過面容、法器、姿勢等傳遞訊息,每個圖案都有意思,例如菩薩代表慈悲,心臟代表欲望,經書代表智慧和知識等等。唐卡繪畫有四大派系,包括單狄、文娜、噶瑪迦底及古根巴,門外漢看唐卡,不是看不明白,就是被其警世圖案嚇倒。
唐卡畫師,由一塊樹葉畫起,經過數十百次上色,山山水水才生出輕巧的色彩漸變效果,月復月,年復年,才畫出一整幅畫來。Kim沉醉在這寧靜絢麗的藝術世界,而這世界,卻非常人所能明白,所以訪問前,她三番四次說唐卡很悶,一般讀者未必理解,並謂自己未必適合受訪。在我看來,這麼沉悶的事,竟能花掉她這美麗女孩六年光陰,更令她許下不談戀愛不結婚的承諾,那顯然並不是一件沉悶的事。

赴尼泊爾習畫六年

十年前,她從中央聖馬汀藝術設計學院(Central Saint Martins College of Art and Design)畢業不久,跟家人去西藏旅行,看到一個遊客手上一幅畫有壇城的唐卡。壇城,即佛教諸神的壇場和宮殿,她解釋:「壇城是一些幾何圖案,我沿着線條看,像是去到淨土般,像是進入禪修的境界。」她驚訝唐卡藝術比她修讀的平面設計有過之而無不及,「我讀設計,知道甚麼顏色配搭起來最奪目好看,那些唐卡,動輒有千年歷史,竟然如此懂得用色之道,顏色配搭可謂至潮至靚。」
就是這一眼之緣,驅使Kim遠赴尼泊爾加德滿都的Tsering Art School學習唐卡,起初只打算學習一兩個月,誰料一晃眼竟潛心六年作畫。媽媽是佛教徒,也很反對,覺得當唐卡畫師沒有將來,她又哄又騙:「我說去一個月就回來,呃呃騙騙就去了六年。」當時尼泊爾還在打仗,生活條件落後,更難捱的是,要一個藝術名校畢業生由幼兒班學起,學畫一塊樹葉,在畫板上反覆練習,畫足一星期,畫至線條流麗,左右對稱才收貨,然後再學畫蓮花、雲捲、佛像等等。未正式在畫布上繪畫之前,她得勤加練習,練習也不是在白紙上繪畫這麼簡單,一筆一劃都是工夫──先把竹枝劈開成小小一支,用刀仔削尖竹枝一頭,再用火燒一燒,就成為一支畫筆,畫筆有了,卻只可在塗滿酥油和撲滿石灰粉的畫板上練習,畫到有一定功力了,才可正式在畫布上繪畫。

一幅唐卡動輒畫數月

好了,苦練好基本功後,終於可以繪畫唐卡了。不過繪畫之前,還得先用木條搭起畫架,縫上畫布,連縫布用的繩也要畫師自己逐條逐條綑綁起來。Kim作畫近十年,但作品數目有限,因為畫一塊唐卡動輒數月,甚至需時一年,單是畫佛像背後的山水,已經要上色多遍,每次要薄薄塗一層顏色,才做出漸變效果。Kim:「畫西洋畫,是表達自己,畫是溝通渠道,但唐卡剛剛相反,要把感受鎖起來,一點也不可透露;要讓世界接受你,不是要你接受世界。」她信奉藏傳佛教中的白教,修習的唐卡派別叫噶瑪迦底,這畫派特色是細節精妙,顏色輕巧,以寬闊山水作背景,着重陰影效果,又傳承了印度傳統畫佛像的格式。
Kim畫的一幅六道輪迴圖,看在外人眼中可能感覺恐怖,在畜生道,掛上一頭頭被屠宰的動物;在地獄道,人飽受浴火之苦;在人間道,生老病死是苦,離別是苦,愛人也是苦,畫中的四臂觀音一臉慈悲,消除六道輪迴的痛苦。唐卡圖像常常把人嚇倒,只因為要借畫說教,「古代人好直接,不如我們現代人般兜大圈。」餓鬼不是用來嚇人,只是提醒眾生「吝嗇是種痛苦」,地獄也可解讀為「憤怒帶來的痛苦」。數年前,Kim在尼泊爾成立一所唐卡學校,去年更在中環舊樓辦了一個小小的「滿獅唐卡工作室」,推廣這門冷僻藝術,但她謝絕所有三分鐘熱度的客人,收錄的學生都是佛教徒,因為唐卡於她來說已經不是一門興趣,而是終身使命。去年,她更受了梵行居士戒,那是與比丘尼接近的誓言──她矢志獻身宗教,不談戀愛,也不結婚,「我找到一樣我應該做得好的事情。」這次,媽媽知道後哭了。

未繪畫先做畫布

畫唐卡,先要做好畫布,畫布做得不好就難以上色,只好作廢。
1.挑塊純棉布,用針線縫上竹竿,外圍加個木架,把棉布拉至繃緊。畫架四邊繩子,也要畫師自己親手穿上。
2.古人用獸皮,現代人用動物皮革,加石膏粉和水煮成奶白色溶液。
3.奶白色液體倒上棉布,重複用石頭和水打磨及曬乾。
4.待棉布全被填封,便可用來畫唐卡。

平時練習

學唐卡平靜內心

這門另類藝術竟吸引一班年輕女士來學,有白領,也有投資銀行的精英,共通點是她們大部份都是佛教徒,希望有天能親手畫一幅唐卡。在銀行工作的Anita不但不覺得唐卡圖案嚇人,反而看着唐卡時內心很平靜。任職環保機構的Amy:「結婚時,有個朋友親手畫了一幅唐卡給我,我覺得很特別,於是希望了解這門藝術。」翻看Amy的練習簿,調上各種顏色,原來先要了解各種用色,才能學畫各種唐卡常見圖案,畫簿上的圖像摩尼珠,是習畫以來的成果。

滿獅唐卡工作室(26960008)

地址:中環域多利皇后街14號2樓 
網址:http://www.munselart.com

Saturday, 13 April 2013

因明

http://read.goodweb.cn/news/news_more.asp?lm2=1109&open=_blank&tj=0&hot=0